Program Evaluation in an Aquatic Agricultural System
Many rural poor and marginalized people strive to make a living in social-ecological systems that are characterized by multiple and often inequitable interactions. Uncertainty and inequality in such systems require research and development interventions to be adaptive.
Complexity-aware approaches to planning, monitoring and evaluating development interventions are gaining strength, yet, there is still little empirical evidence of what it takes to implement them. We share learning from an agricultural research program that used participatory action research and theory of change to foster learning and support transformative change in aquatic agricultural systems.
We share learning on the importance of bringing a strengths-based engagement of stakeholders, building a common goal as a starting point, to allow for a more critical practice. Opportunities for digging deeper emerge.
Abstract on behalf of the authors: J Marina Apgar, Will Allen, Joelle Albert, Boru Douthwaite, Rodrigo Paz Ybarnegaray, and Jeston Lunda
You can access this article for free for 30 days starting by using THIS LINK.
After you’ve had a chance to read this piece, please share your thoughts, ideas, or experiences with our community in the comments below so we can continue this discussion!
Latest posts by Dusty Columbia Embury (see all)
- Work-integrated learning and health literacy as catalysts for Roma empowerment and social inclusion: A participatory action research - May 26, 2017
- Guy O’Grady Sharrock responds to the paper entitled ‘‘Getting beneath the surface in program planning, monitoring and evaluation: Learning from use of Participatory Action Research and Theory of Change in the CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems’’ - May 24, 2017
- AR Special Issue: Development, Aid, and Social Transformation - May 22, 2017